: Should a canonical URL be search engine friendly? I'm using Drupal with search engine friendly URLs. The way Drupal works is that there's two ways to reference a node with SEF URLS switched

@Sims2060225

You could also do what stackoverflow does, which is a hybrid approach:
example.com/questions/1234/question-name-slug

That way you've got a page that has the title in the url, but has a permanent piece of identifying info there as well (the question id). This way the title can be changed, and users arriving at the old URL can get redirected to the new one. In fact, you can put ANYTHING in the question title area after the question ID and arrive at a valid page. The page they serve points to the current url (including the current page title) as the canonical copy, but they don't redirect you.

This approach seems to be VERY SEO friendly, while still allowing article titles to change. It might be hard to implement in drupal though.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Mendez628

Everything Bevan said is true.

Your best bet is to use 301 redirects from the old URL to the new one just like Drupal does with the note ID to the SEF url.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Shanna517

My understanding is that words within the URL that match search terms are considered "good quality" matches.

I certainly see lots of matches based on URL when I go searching for technology specific answers involving Jargon.

By using the node id link instead of a content-based URL, I think you'll match less well, if only marginally. But, I have no references to back up my understanding.

Vote Up Vote Down