Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Speyer207

: Unnatural flip of Google local results For many years I have been helping companies gain a better presence though legit methods though on page optimization to fating up the pages to give Google

@Speyer207

Posted in: #Google #GoogleRanking #Seo

For many years I have been helping companies gain a better presence though legit methods though on page optimization to fating up the pages to give Google more indicators and the visitors a more rich experience.

This week I'm completely mind blow to what Google has done to a local search result and I just don't know what to say to my client because I have no idea why its happened, it looks like a manual adjustment to the LOCAL SERPS.

It may help if I explain whats happened, this is not a natural shift in results but a completely drastic flip of results.

I'll try and explain by using an example as for NDA reasons I can't disclose any information.

Basically this is last weeks result (ones with letters are the first 7 results that are returned that a have Google maps/Places presence). All sites that end with ingo are a set of groups and another set is ending with uffa - to illustrate a completely shift.


Gumtree
Checkatrade
Dingo - (A)
Lingo - (B)
Bingo - (C)
Singo - (D)
Gingo - (E)
Yingo - (F)
Hingo - (G)
Muffa
Puffa
Duffa
Suffa
Ruffa
Tuffa


That was last week and here's the shocker, it now looks like this:
Now this week:


Muffa - (A)
Puffa - (B)
Duffa - (C)
Suffa - (D)
Ruffa - (E)
Tuffa - (F)
Gumtree
Checkatrade
Dingo - (G)
Lingo
Bingo
Singo
Gingo
Yingo
Hingo


The 'Ingo' sets are completely different sites and are fairly high quality sites, the sites that are now displaying are much less quality, very thin and so on. I've tested in multiple browsers, cleared cache, and even used various of other devices such as phone on a different IP to see if Google is caching the results, sadly its not because I got some online friends to confirm.

So has anyone heard anything official, in the past week or month that could have this huge effect, its not a nature shift in rankings, you just don't get 9 sites lose their rank and have the bottom half of the page become the new leaders.

I'm actually really annoyed about this because its a waste of hard work if Google are not going to return the sites that deserve returning.

10.01% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Speyer207

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Hamm4606531

Without seeing actual results my best guess is unnatural links were found in and to these sites.

Watch this video and then watch the rest of Matt Cutts' videos and you'll understand how SEO has changed forever.

Also to create a far better local search strategy sign up for Brian Clark's AgentPress and apply his real estate methods to your local SEO efforts.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme