: Is it a good idea to make "safety copy" of articles from referring sites? My wife has a small business with a website, of which I am the maintainer. (I am not a trained web developer, but

@Ann8826881

First of all, is it a legal and accepted practice in general (assuming we have the original owner's consent)?


If you have the author's or copyright holder's consent to copy their works (i.e., web pages), then it is legally acceptable to do so, providing that you don't alter their content without prior approval, retain their copyright notice, and retain the copyrights of any other works included in these.

In general however, most sites do not copy entire web pages from other sites, and instead either quote from them and/or provide links to them so that users can view the latest version of their pages, as well as any relevant information. Linking relevant pages between authoritative sites also helps build SEO.


At this point I am more interested in whether Google and other search engines penalize this, and how to play by the rules if
possible.


If you copy entire web pages to your site, you'll be creating duplicate content issues whereby search engines will find two sets of the same content. Search engines may also view this as an attempt to mirror or scrape another website for black hat SEO purposes. In this case, your site could be penalized.

If you do copy web pages to your site, be sure to add a canonical URL to each of them pointing to the original source. It's probably also wise to add a URL to the original source at the top or bottom of the page so that users can also find the latest version and other relevant information.

If you decide to link to them instead but find that the web page was later removed, you might be able to find it again in websites that archive/cache web pages, such as here, and then update the page's link to that.

Vote Up Vote Down