: Image as a background for a website - good or bad? Blogger has some quite awful templates to offer, but one way to make it look less terrible to the eye of a layman (me) is with this background
Blogger has some quite awful templates to offer, but one way to make it look less terrible to the eye of a layman (me) is with this background picture:
Yet, I haven't seen many popular blogs that do this. Is setting a large, colorful (but relatively undistracting - you be the judge here though) image as the background considered a bad practice?
More posts by @Hamaas447
3 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
I strongly disagree with use of such background pictures. You want eye of user to be brought to your main content, not your background !
Unless you use a dynamic template, you have almost total freedom to customise in Blogger - without having to pay for self-hosting.
The good:
You like the way it looks.
It makes it easy to identify your blog (uniqueness).
The bad:
Check the file size. Large images can slow down the site. I'd try to limit it to 150KB.
It ends up being the branding for your website (what makes your website identifiable), but it looks rather generic. You probably want to brand your website more strongly.
It isn't going to be visible on all screen resolutions. You have a wide monitor. Users with laptop screens, mobile phones, and portrait monitors are never going to know that the image exists. They will see the rather boring look and feel to which you object.
Some other options for a more exciting look to your blog would be:
A cover photo
A logo
Your own color scheme
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2024 All Rights reserved.