Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Murray155

: Would publishing a canonical, consumer-facing article feed for our white label editorial content help our clients? We deliver syndicated content to our clients' sites. In our articles, we often

@Murray155

Posted in: #CanonicalUrl #DuplicateContent #Google #SearchEngines #Seo

We deliver syndicated content to our clients' sites. In our articles, we often link to blogs. We recently received a complaint from a blog that our link to them hurt their Google ranking, likely because of the way we publish our content:


content is duplicated across multiple client sites (it's syndicated, after all)
~300 instances of the article go live at the same time (published as soon as articles are ready)
articles are typically less than 1,000 characters (to make for shorter, more "snackable" content)
articles contain numerous links to other sources (they are usually fashion articles referencing multiple examples of one trend or another)
we do not publish a canonical version of the articles (as a B2B vendor, we do not have a consumer-facing outlet for our content)


We do not plan to change the first four conditions, as they serve our business needs. However, we are considering creating an article feed on our corporate domain in order to provide a canonical source for each article. What impact would this have on the way Google sees our content?

Our client sites contain authoritative and unique content. However, syndicated may comprise a little over half of client site content. How would this move to create a canonical feed on our domain impact our client sites?

Note!
Each instance of an article on a site is canonical in terms of sharing on Facebook. So, if I share an article from xyz.com, the link would go to xyz.com/articles/title-123. The same article shared from abc.com would go to abc.com/articles/title-123. Whatever we do must not interfere with that schema.

10.01% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Murray155

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Pope3001725

If 300 or so sites are all publishing the same content it probably is hurting their Google ranking. If it isn't yet, it will at some point. Having the same content available on multiple URLs, especially multiple websites, is exactly what Google doesn't want. They want a canonical source for content so they can ranking it properly and not have redundant data in their search results.

Creating a canonical source for all of this content on your website is a great idea and is a win-win for everybody. Your site becomes the authoritative source of widely republished content. Your clients no longer have duplicate content on their website. Google only has one URL for each article.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme