Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Heady270

: Should a responsive site include in its sitemap? Should a website built with responsive design include Google's <mobile:mobile/> xml tag in its sitemap.xml? In other words, will marking

@Heady270

Posted in: #ResponsiveWebdesign #Seo #Sitemap #XmlSitemap

Should a website built with responsive design include Google's <mobile:mobile/> xml tag in its sitemap.xml? In other words, will marking each of my urls as "mobile" in the sitemap for a responsive site indicate to Google that these urls are not desktop friendly (when, in fact they are)? What is the best practice in terms of sitemaps for responsive sites? One sitemap with <mobile:mobile/> in each <url>? Two identical sitemaps, one containing <mobile:mobile/>, and the other not? One sitemap without <mobile:mobile/>?

10.01% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Heady270

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Cofer257

Google seems a little fuzzy about it, but I would say no, you shouldn't mark responsive pages as mobile.

The page you linked to states:


A Mobile Sitemap can contain only URLs that serve mobile web content. Any URLs that serve only non-mobile web content will be ignored by the Google crawling mechanisms.


Taking this exactly as written, it could mean that all URLs in your mobile sitemap must be formatted for mobiles (which they are), but technically they could be simultaneously formatted for desktop too.

But I think the implication is that the URLs should be only for mobiles and not responsive.

The fact is, Google detects responsive sites perfectly well, so if those URLs are in a standard XML sitemap it knows they work fine on both mobile and desktop.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme