: URLs with parameters & canonical tags. Block them via robots.txt vs GSC URL parameters? I have some URLs with parameters, the parameters aren't of the filtering kind, they don't create millions

@Candy875

There are several questions to answer here:


What's the best way for me to take care of this situation and avoid wasting Google's crawl budget and also let my pages get the most of the weight from authority pages?


As you say the parameters do not create millions of new URLs. So it would be okay to let Google crawl them. Your Canonicals do the rest of the work.


Do I unblock these pages in robots.txt but rather go to Google Search Console and configure URL parameters to set them as they don't affect page content, so Google won't crawl all instances of URLs with that parameter?


Do not handle parameters in Search Console. First, it only works for Google and none of the other Search Engines. Second, no one but you knows about the parameter handling and can do changes to it if necessary but you. Third, parameter handling in Search Console can not be easily tested by crawling your page.
Use canonical link elements instead.


Do I keep canonical tags on these URLs with parameters?


Definitely yes - keep a canonical link pointing to the URL without parameters. If set up properly Google will understand your canonical linking scheme and respect it.

To sum it up:

Unblock your parameters in robots.txt and make use of canonical link elements pointing to the non-parameter-URLs.
This is the perfect use case for what canonical link elements have been invented.

Maybe one day you'll find a way of tracking internal traffic without using parameters.

Vote Up Vote Down