Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Karen161

: Is using optional URL segments bad for SEO? I have a multilanguage site with urls like this https://example.org/en/ads/2 https://example.org/es/ads/2 https://example.org/it/ads/2 which serve the site

@Karen161

Posted in: #Internationalization #Multilingual #Seo

I have a multilanguage site with urls like this
example.org/en/ads/2 https://example.org/es/ads/2 example.org/it/ads/2

which serve the site in different languages. My site also accepts URLs like this
example.org/ads/2

In that case the content is served in the default language (Spanish).

The site does not generate any URLs without locale. It accepts this kind of URLs, but then any following links for internal navigation are generated with the default locale (es).

I've been told that this is bad for SEO because different URLs (https://example.org/ads/2, example.org/es/ads/2) serve the same content.

Is this true? If yes, why?

10.01% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Karen161

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Kaufman445

If you canonicalise appropriately, it is fine. Use rel="canonical" to specify that the pages are identical, and hreflang for the alternate languages.

<link rel="canonical" href="https://example.org/es/ads/2">
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href="https://example.org/en/ads/2">
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="es" href="https://example.org/es/ads/2">
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="it" href="https://example.org/it/ads/2">

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme