Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Gonzalez347

: Will search engines take into account hidden blog post metadata? I have a personal blog and all the articles in it are decorated with metadata conforming to the "http://schema.org/BlogPosting"

@Gonzalez347

Posted in: #SchemaOrg #Seo

I have a personal blog and all the articles in it are decorated with metadata conforming to the "http://schema.org/BlogPosting" schema, I use currently itemprops such as name, headline, articleBody and datePublished.

Since I am the only author in the blog, I initially omitted the author itemprop. However I started considering adding a hidden <p> element containing my name and decorated with the author itemprop.

I would like to keep it hidden since it is pretty obvious who the author is.

Are search engines going to take the hidden element into account ?

The reason behind adding my name to each article as an author is to improve the rank of my blog when someone supplies my name to the search engine (the title of the blog does not contain my actual name).

10.01% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Gonzalez347

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Ann8826881

Structured data about hidden content

Search engines typically don’t publish detailed guidelines about which kind of hidden data (or how much) they take into account for their structured-data-based search result features.

Some is certainly okay -- after all, there are many things for which it wouldn’t always make sense to get displayed on the page (e.g., the height/width of an ImageObject), even shown in Google’s own examples -- and some other probably isn’t.

For example, Google says in their quality guidelines:


Markup should not be used to hide content not visible to users in any form, since it might create a misleading or deceptive search experience. For example, if the JSON-LD markup describes a performer, the HTML body should describe that same performer.


They give an extreme example which doesn’t apply to your case. Unfortunately, they don’t provide more details.

In general, providing hidden data can be perfectly fine and useful, and you shouldn’t omit this data just because a search engine doesn’t take it into account for their rich results. While providing data about visible content is the best case, providing relevant data about invisible content is better than not providing it at all. As long as you don’t try to deceive, you should be fine.

That said, you shouldn’t expect that search engines index your hidden content. If they don’t, your hidden name couldn’t possibly affect the ranking.

Markup in your case

You say that it’s "obvious" who the author is. That means that at some place on your site you show your name, right? In that case, it’s not really hidden content, just content that doesn’t get repeated on every page. Again, search engines don’t publish guidelines that detailed, but I think it’s safe to assume that such a case might get handled differently.

The best practice from the structured data perspective is to define a Person item on the relevant page (e.g., your "About" page, or the homepage, or wherever you say something about yourself) and to reference this item as author of the BlogPosting items on other pages.

See a similar Microdata example, and an explanation about URIs as identifiers.

To enable rich results that require the person’s name as a string value on that page, you can mix both ways:

<div itemprop="author" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemid="/author/Chedy2149#i">
<link itemprop="url" href="/author/Chedy2149" />
<meta itemprop="name" content="Chedy2149" />
</div>


(where /author/Chedy2149#i is the URI that represents the person, and /author/Chedy2149 the URI of the page where the Person item is defined)

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme