: How many logo variation is too many? Some background & context When including third party logos, we often get given low quality files. Mostly these are low resolution JPGs, but I have seen

@Si6392903

Regarding your first example with the different variations of the same logo, I guess it's necessary to create a guideline for this. Sometimes this happens when people simply don't know what's good or not, and just accumulate a bunch of different logos over the years. For this example, you're right, it's too much and you can get rid of the scans, and clean up that "logo bank" for good! Maybe you're the only one who knows file quality well enough to do this. Instead of using 50 different files, have the specifications written in the PDF guide instead and keep only the top quality versions.

But for the second example with different departments, it's normal you'll end up having tons of logos. I think it's alright to provide the color versions with the vectors/high resolution and web version already optimized in your "basic package." You simply need to make sure your logos are sorted properly in different folders that are well identified. That's my way to do it: Industry standard file format deliverables for logos?)

If it's too long to prepare all different versions and you work with other designers, you can also write a guideline for the logo, the tagline, the margins, colors, etc. Personally, I prefer to do all the versions myself because this way I'm certain there's no "Microsoft Word" designer or "Photoshop Guru" who will mess up the logo and downgrade the quality.

I also find it very convenient to always have the files ready for any purpose. When someone asks for a specific format of the logo, you can simply open your folders and send it without having to open any software or having to do conversions. It's a bit more work at the start but on mid/long term it can be a time saver.

The grayscale, bitmap or small monogramme (eg. favicon kind of logo) can be charged in extra. That's stuff you can ask when preparing a quote for a project or to offer as an extra when the logo is completed. It does add value to your services to offer more and you also show you care about your work. But I still consider this as a bonus.

Regarding the vertical and horizontal versions, that too should be an extra that you need to include in your design or preparation price. It's normal some company will want these versions, not all logos are usable vertically and horizontally even though the ideal is to create a logo that will fit well in any kind of layout.

You ask if you should keep the files to a minimum; my answer to this is it depends on the budget, who will use the logos and if the company need these variations. For example, banks, distribution network or corporations often need all the possible variations for their marketing team because it gives them the freedom to manage their identity themselves; if you don't do it,someone else will eventually. For the small budgets or companies, you can offer this as extra or create the logo as needed. Sometimes I need to modify an existing logo for a specific project and it ends up becoming another version of that horizontal/vertical logo. It simply gets added to the "official" logo bank. When that happens, I send a new set of files to my client.

I don't think it's responsible to let clients convert their own web versions of a logo because a lot of time there's quality change, color change, they sometimes use online tools that don't make a good conversion or they even distort the logo sometimes. I'm sure you've been horrified at least once in your life to see a version of your beautiful logo full of pixels on a Facebook fan page profile picture! I like to provide the web logos in png and jpg, from 100px to 800px, that's quick to prepare and usually good enough for what they need. As an extra you can even prepare the logo for social media.

Vote Up Vote Down