: What is the status of numbers in the Mollerup's taxonomy for trademarks? I am wondering how are numbers treated within the taxonomy of trademarks by Per Mollerup which is explained in his book
I am wondering how are numbers treated within the taxonomy of trademarks by Per Mollerup which is explained in his book Marks of Excellence.
Numbers are not explicitly defined and I believe there should be a distinction between literal numbers (numerical value) and numbers which represent other letters or words.
Example of literal/actual numbers: 100 Kilo, Studio 42
Examples of representative numbers: H3LL0, Gift2Win, 4EVER
The names are made up for the sake of this question.
Taxonomy reference:
Consider a trademark which consists of only numbers, or it could have a name but the logo is just numbers, where will it fit in the taxonomy?
Any feedback appreciated.
P.S This is for a research in graphic design studies.
Further reading: iconresearch.net/mollerups-taxonomy
More posts by @Gretchen549
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
Generally speaking, you can’t trademark numbers because they are not distinctive enough. There are exceptions, but they prove the rule because they are things like Boeing’s “747” where the number became so absurdly well known that you could say “seven-four-seven” to a random person in the street and they would know you were referring to the airplane, and even in that case, it was only after the 747 became famous that Boeing got the trademark. If creating a new trademark today, you would never want to make one that was only numbers. There is almost no chance of trademarking it.
So to the specific point of your question, there shouldn’t be a place in the taxonomy for numbers-only trademarks. Numbers can accessorize letters and words to make something distinctive, but numbers by themselves are not distinctive.
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2025 All Rights reserved.