: How to design the letter ß (eszett or sharp S) When designing a typeface, how should I design the letter ß? Looking at existing typefaces there seems to be a some variations of how the

@Berryessa866

From the article The Multifaceted Design of the Lowercase Sharp S (ß):


Today there are two standard models for the design of the ß character. [...] They are recommendable for most of today’s typefaces.


1. The ſs Ligature Design

Using a ligature of ſ and s is the usual choice for humanist typefaces and is used by both serif and sans serif typefaces.



Designing the ß in this way should be simple, since it is just an ſ and s connected with an arc. The similarity between the ſ and f characters mean that typefaces without an ſ design often use an f without the crossbar.

The connection between the ſ and s is important.


The connection however is mandatory today. While an unconnected design is a historic variation, it won’t be accepted by today’s readers.


A continuous or abrupt connection

The connection between the ſ and s shapes usually connect as one continuous curve, but there are typefaces which emphasize the different characters clearly by making a distinct change of direction.




German readers without a background in typography see the ß as one character. Stressing ſ and s as individual parts of that design is neither expected nor necessarily helpful. Just as a W exposing its origin as ligature of two V is a possibility, but not necessarily helpful.




2. The Sulzbach Design



This design is used more with geometric or constructed typefaces as the two arcs work better than the flowing form of the connected ſs ligature. The connection of the two arcs shouldn't connect with the stem and the bottom should not be closed, as not to confuse the design with a capital B.


Around 1900 an official German orthography was established and a committee of type founders and printers met to define rules regarding the design and use of German characters like ß, ö, ä, ü [...] The design proposal that was chosen had similarities with an unusual letter used in the 17th century by the printer Abraham Lichtenthaler in the city of Sulzbach and is therefore now known as “Sulzbacher Form” (Sulzbach design).




Other Considerations

The half-crossbar on the ſ is ok but isn't needed

The ſ sometimes has a horizontal stroke on the left side. If so the ß should have this stroke as well. This isn't however required in the case of the ſ or ß—or even desirable.


In my opinion, it only supports the confusion of ſ and f and therefore the horizontal stroke might also be omitted for ſ and ß in modern typefaces. Either way, ſ and ß should always follow the same principles.


The descender

The ſ character will normally have a descender in italic or script designs and the ß should follow this design. This is also standard for german handwriting.




Blackletter ß

Another design sometimes seen is derived from a blackletter ß. This is not a standard design however and may not be desired.





All images and references from The Multifaceted Design of the Lowercase Sharp S (ß) by Ralf Herrmann

Vote Up Vote Down

@Ogunnowo857

originated as a ligature for ſs


No, but that doesn’t really need to concern you, since the history and the expected design are different things.

The two different typical designs you show are both valid today. The version in the first line is typical for more geometric/constructed typefaces, the version in the second line is typical for so-called “humanistic” typefaces.

Vote Up Vote Down