Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Margaret771

: Do I need to license fonts included with my OS? I've noticed that most custom fonts include a license.txt file that requests some amount of money for a commercial license. I am interested in

@Margaret771

Posted in: #FontLicensing

I've noticed that most custom fonts include a license.txt file that requests some amount of money for a commercial license.

I am interested in whether it is also necessary to license OS (Mac/Windows) included fonts for commercial use. As a side question, is font theft an issue in the industry?

10.03% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Margaret771

3 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Sims5801359

IANAL but if you did want to distribute font files normally included with operating systems, or use them outside their OS context, they would need to be licenced appropriately.

You'd need to follow up with individual foundries (font companies) or their resellers.

Ascender, now part of Monotype, handle licencing for all Microsoft fonts though.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Michele215

As a side question, is font theft an
issue in the industry?


Of course. Files required to do a job that are small and typically without DRM are going to be shared whether the foundries like it or not. OTF was (is) supposed to handle licensing, but it is looking more and more that some kind of font server is required for that to happen. Given the cost of available server applications and the fonts themselves (not to mention the overly-restrictive nature of most font licenses; you'd think Adobe hired the same lawyers as the stock photo industry), I don't see this scenario changing anytime soon for most designers.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Goswami567

I am interested in whether it is also necessary to license OS (Mac/Windows) included fonts for commercial use.


Depends how you define "use". IANAL, but as far as I know, using a font you legally purchased (either separately or as a part of the OS) to create creative work, and redistributing the font as part of that work in a non-embedded form (i.e. as a bitmap or with the vectorized outlines of the letters) is always okay. Meaning that if you use a font to e.g. create a logo, the font's creator will usually have no rights to the logo. (See @e100 's comment for an example that says otherwise. Be sure to always check the actual license.)

What is usually out of bounds, or limited, is redistribution of the original font "software" - including converting the font to another format, embedding it in a document, or in a web page using @font -face.

If in doubt, check out the font license that is supposed to be shipped with every font... Although I have no clue where that license is supposed to be e.g. in MS Windows. Maybe you'll have to contact Microsoft and explicitly request it.

Fonts shipped with Open Source OS's usually come with a less restrictive Open-Source license - see this question for a list. But note that the GPL may also inherently prohibit the redistribution in closed-source products under some conditions - check the license carefully before including the font in any product you sell.

Examples:


Microsoft Typography FAQ - Font redistribution

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme