Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Smith883

: What's the deal with all these popular website having poor usability I'm wondering this for quite some time, and it's a question about human-computer interaction and usability. A lot of popular

@Smith883

Posted in: #Usability

I'm wondering this for quite some time, and it's a question about human-computer interaction and usability.

A lot of popular websites have (in my opinion) poor usability, and I wonder what you guys think of that, and I also wonder why users still prefer these websites. I'll start off with a few examples.

Wikipedia I'm not talking here about the actual wiki's. But If you want to get into editing these pages it starts with a big mess. There are tons of discussions in the pages behind the wiki's. For example:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#30_kb
This is bulletin board with thousands of lines of comments, no proper way to identify who's posting what. And all that indentation. It's really annoying me and it's one of the reasons I'm not editing wiki's.

Twitter Okay, I get the deal with the 140 characters in a message. It forces people to make small messages, and it's ideal for mobile devices. However, a lot of people nowadays are having conversations over twitter. And that's where it gets messy, if someone replies at a tweet of someone else, it's almost impossible to find the corresponding tweet. Also, you're forced to cramp #hastags and @people in your message, so for me it's very messy.

Craigslist Euhm, yeah craigslist... I'm not even starting on this one.

This post is not a complaint about these websites. I'm just surprised they are lacking even the most basic usability features. And that makes me wonder the following thing.

Everyone on this website is talking about usability, and human computer interaction. A lot of people study the effects of them on websites. People have gained PhD's in them.

Then why is it, that the most popular websites on the internet, do not follow the basic rules of usability, and have a lot of things that can improved for better user experience.

Then, another question, is it even proven that adding usability features actually IMPROVE the quality of the user experience of the website

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Smith883

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Sherry384

I think you misunderstand the concept of usability.

You might dislike Craigslist design, but the usability is good.
Just test it: open the website and ask you mom to find bikes to buy.
She will take about 2 sec to find the link on the homepage, and you're done.
Lists of blue links are easy to understand.
That's usability.

You understand the point with Twitter, and they've added a way to get the "reply from" tweet. At least gwibber (linux client) displays the link to it.

For wikipedia, the discussions are not the main face of the website.
The thing is that it's easy to contribute: click Edit, and go!
And then you learn the syntax easily by copying what you see on other pages.
Your mom could do it.

About usability: yes, it improves user experience, if done well.
But, depending on context, some well-known usability advice might work or not.
For example, "OK buttons are green, Cancel are red".
If you do that, everyone will instinctively understand your buttons.
But your webdesigner will complain: green is not in the color palette used on the website, and adding something green in a purple/brown website will be ugly, so you go for a blue OK and a purple Cancel....

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Goswami781

Because if the content is compelling then users are prepared to put up with the lack of usability to get what they want done. Also, each of those sites works because they are the most popular in their field. If there were lots of user-editable encyclopaedias then none of them would be successful because you'd have to look up information on each one. Wikipedia works well because it is the main place to go for reference material on a broad range of subjects.

However for the rest of us creating websites, unless we can find something that no other site caters for, we have to compete with lots of other people in the same area - companies offering similar products or services. So the way to stand out for us it is to make something that's easier to use, then people will use our site rather than the other sites in the same field.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme