: Is "no-index" necessary with extensive, white-labeled syndication? For the purposes of this discussion, consider the following scenario: You have written a fair amount of quality, unpublished content
For the purposes of this discussion, consider the following scenario:
You have written a fair amount of quality, unpublished content that third-party websites wish to license from you and white-label on their own sites (i.e. you are ghostwriting for these third parties). In other words, there will be no attribution or links referring to your name, email address, or website at all; it will appear to readers and search engines as if the article were written by the third party instead of by you.
Consider that 10,000 of these third-party sites were created independently, without any association to each other (they are absolutely NOT part of a blog farm network). From your collection of 100 articles, you plan to license the white-label publishing right of each article to 100 of these sites (again, on a per-article basis). So, while each of your 100 articles will be published 100 times, it's fair to assume that no site will host all 100 articles. The most any one site will host is 30 articles.
Now for the question: Given this scenario, and that your intent is not to game search engines at all (but rather to provide quality content on established websites), do you need to include "no-index" meta tags on the pages that display your content?
Clearly, you wouldn't want your customers to receive the wrath of the Google Duplicate Content Penalty. However, at the same time, if they can benefit from any Google juice deriving from your content, then that would be a nice benefit.
I suppose a more concise question may be, "Would this behavior cause Google to penalize the third-party websites? Or, would Google simply choose one of the sites as hosting the "best" version of the content on a per-article basis?"
More posts by @Gail5422790
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
If the same article appears on 100 sites then that is duplicate content. There's no denying that. But there is no "Duplicate Content Penalty", or at least probably not what you are thinking.
Where duplicate content occurs, Google will usually return only one instance of the article. It could be the first one they detected (assumed to be the 'original') or it could be whichever page they deem most important (e.g. has more links to it).
Search engines would not penalise the site as a whole, that one page would just not rank well in searches. So there is no real need to prevent indexing of those pages. And there is no reason for you to enforce anything like this - it should be obvious to your clients that the content will not be original to their site, and thus the onus is on them whether they wish to prevent indexing. (You could of course make recommendations, but as detailed above, this isn't necessary.)
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2024 All Rights reserved.