: How do I determine what the image file format and resolution should be when scanning? I understand the title to my question is very vague, but bare with me, I think I can make it a bit
I understand the title to my question is very vague, but bare with me, I think I can make it a bit more precise in the question body.
Recently my mother was asking for help with digitizing a large set of photographs her partner has - tens of thousands of the things, that need to be digitized so they can be sent to book publishers and possibly other types of clients. So I needed to work out how much space she'd need, which raised the question of how high quality the scans would need to be.
That's just an example situation, my question is a bit broader than that: in general, in which industries and situations is quality the most important? One thing I was curious about was what file formats are typically used. Personally I see no visible difference between a 100% quality JPEG and lossless file, but how do professionals feel about that? Is there every a situation where that minute difference becomes important? If so, is it just being overly fastidious, or does it genuinely matter?
Recently, I also heard about photography sessions running into the hundreds of gigabytes. That just blows my mind, wouldn't the images need to be hundreds of megs each? What would ever make them that large?
I hope my question isn't too broad. To break it down into more concrete chunks:
When does the lossless/high quality lossy distinction matter?
Can you provide a rough comparison of what's considered an acceptable DPI in various industries/situations, or in your particular industry?
What file formats are typically used? Just JPEG for lossy and PNG for lossless? Or are fancy domain-specific formats preferred? If so, why?
More posts by @Sent7350415
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
This really is too broad. But broad recommendations can be given for a broad problem ...
Resolution considerations
In general terms
300ppi for print
72 for web
More every day for mobile and tablet (the highest right now is 433ppi, I believe).
The catch is that your resolution is output size. If you can guess the final crop and dimensions and intended use of every one of those many thousands of photos then you're a psychic.
Calculating required source resolution
With the above info in mind, you can take a shot at the largest reasonable use (8x10" @ 300ppi?) and the most dramatic crop (50%?) and calculate your scanning resolution from there. With those numbers, a 4x6" source image should be scanned at 1200ppi.
The formula is:
((target size ÷ source size) ÷ crop factor) * final resolution = source resolution
So the scenario I described would be: ((8/4)/.5)*300=1200
Notice the result if you use the vertical dimension: ((10/6)/.5)*300=1000
Because of the difference in aspect ratio between source and target, you can get yourself into trouble if you calculate from the closer dimensions.
Of course, you also have to take into account
Production quality of the destination media
Expectations of your audience
Quality of the originals
File types
I prefer a lossless format like tiff with compression to be sure nothing is lost.
Jpeg is intended for outputting to final size for low bandwidth applications. Jpeg files should not be resaved because you're giving up more info: They should be re-exported.
I really don't know happens to quality with a 100% jpg because I don't see the point. Just use compressed tiff and you'll save size.
Photo shoots and file sizes
The reason a professional shoot results in such large files is RAW format. A professional size sensor capturing in RAW format produces mammoth files. But it also holds on to a whole lot of good data! Even in the enthusiast point and shoots, the RAW files are pretty large.
Fortunately, SD cards have gotten cheaper, faster, and really large!
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2024 All Rights reserved.