Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Nimeshi995

: Do other search engines support Google's "hash bang" syntax for crawling AJAX applications? Google has a really nice document explaining how web developers can get Google to crawl non-AJAX versions

@Nimeshi995

Posted in: #Ajax #SearchEngines #Seo #WebCrawlers

Google has a really nice document explaining how web developers can get Google to crawl non-AJAX versions of their web applications to make it possible for Google to index AJAX-heavy websites.

Do any other search engines support this standard?

I'm specifically interested in the fragment meta tag method, not just the #! URL method.

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Nimeshi995

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Rivera981

Simple answer, yes, Bing and DuckDuckGo support this.

This article suggests bing does support it. The site imelda-immobilien.de has no "static" pages, they're all ajax driven. A search on Bing and DuckDuckGo shows multiple ajax urls in the results.

Yahoo is powered by bing, and so their results show the same.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Heady270

I would choose to use push state rather than hash bang AJAX URLs now. Google's Matt Cutts just said this about push state:


A correcly implemented site that uses push state typically doesn't need any extra support enabled for us to crawl it.


It should be much easier for other crawlers that might not support hash bang to deal with a push state site.



According to a web page that no longer exists, Bing does now support hash bang crawling. I haven't been able to find information about the meta fragment support for either Bing or Yahoo.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme