: Recommended column width for text reading, digital vs printed Coming form a digital background, I have often read different kinds of suggestions (for example 35-50 ems) for how wide a column

@Sue6373160

Yes there are some nice recomendations e.g. desktoppub.about.com/cs/finetypography/ht/line_length.htm
and attempts to convert knowledge from printed to online typography www.pearsonified.com/2011/12/golden-ratio-typography.php
but universal ideal is not right question as for first the ideal depends on type of text (heavy scientific vs novel) font, line-height(!) and for the second we don't have control over number of letters per line.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Shelley591

While studies have been done on text readability, most are inconclusive, some are contradictory, and, in general, there isn't a lot of it out there.

Line length is but one factor in the overall readability of a column of text. So it's hard to judge it on its own.

You also have to take into account:


the typeface being used
the leading (line-spacing)
margins
context (newspaper? Billboard?)


The best solution, IMHO, is to read what you design. Often we as designers can get hung up on the overall look of something and forget to actually test the usability of it ourselves.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Jessie844

In traditional print media optimal line length is considered to be around 50-75 characters per line, including spaces.Too short and you break the readers rythm and add stress to the reading experience. Too long and you make it hard to skip from the end of one line to the correct next line.

However, studies have shown that for on screen reading the optimal line length is actualy longer at around 95 characters or even higher. Also see the line length misconception.

So it would seem that no, print and digital are actualy different and should not be mirrored.This would also argue the point that fluid web layouts should be avoided.

Bear in mind that readability is not just about line length.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Ravi4787994

Line lengths are usually measured in words or characters per line (or at least in my experience). I don't think print and digital are any different — the same general rules of typography apply. Short lines can create design issues and slow reading down, long lines can be unwieldy.

This study may be helpful:


This study examined the effects of line length on reading performance. Reading rates were found to be fastest at 95 cpl. Readers reported either liking or disliking the extreme line lengths (35 cpl, 95 cpl). Those that liked the 35 cpl indicated that the short line length facilitated "faster" reading and was easier because it required less eye movement. Those that liked the 95 cpl stated that they liked having more information on a page at one time. Although some participants reported that they felt like they were reading faster at 35 cpl, this condition actually resulted in the slowest reading speed.


The Effects of Line Length on Reading Online News

For slabs of body copy, I like about 70 characters per line, but anything in the 50-80 range seems good. I also think justified text is harder to read, due to the lack of unique shapes to track on the right side of text — it's far easier to lose your place.

It's also worth keeping line length in mind when designing fluid layouts. Maximum column widths are a good thing if you want to maintain legibility.

Vote Up Vote Down