: Can an artist display their past work in a portfolio if they were paid to produce it? I'm creating a website an artist who draws with pencil+paper. The artist has scans and/or prints of

@Candy945

It depends from country laws, but in general the transfer of any right must be written in the contract, to be valid.

If he had explicitly signed to transfer rights of


produce copies or reproductions
perform or display the work publicly
transmit or display


he can't copy and show his works, also on the Web. Otherwise he can use them, even if were paid.

From Wikipedia:


Under the U.S. Copyright Act, a transfer of ownership in copyright must be memorialized in a writing signed by the transferor.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Holmes874

Speaking generally, the copyright belongs to the artist unless they "give" their rights away (contractually or otherwise) or they produce the work as a "work for hire". The term "work for hire" has a very specific meaning in the US.

Here's the AIGA's take on copyright ownership.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Nimeshi706

Here my two cents...

Typically, there's some sort of agreement or contract laid out. If there is no contract, legally, I don't believe there's anything the client can say or do. I mean, there's nothing to prove anything.

Often times an artist may also specify that they may use the work as part of their portfolio. Other times a client may buy exclusive rights to the artwork.

But again, without a contract you can't prove much of anything.

Either way, it shouldn't make too much of a difference to you. You wouldn't get in trouble for anything anyway if you're unaware of it. That would be the artists responsibility.

I'm no lawyer though, so don't take my post as any legal advice.

Vote Up Vote Down