: Any Google Font that renders equally well both on Windows (IE) and Mac (Cr, FF, Saf)? I like the fonts available at Google Fonts but I've noted some sans-serif choices render markedly different

@Connie430

We found that under WindowsXP the google font we were using, Open Sans, rendered particularly badly. It was different to Mac on other Windows platforms we tested but on Windows XP the font was difficult to read. The website has now been coded to change fonts to Arial if WindowsXP is detected.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Pierce403

Being completely aware of the font rendering differences between the two platforms, I think @torr is noticing the same problem I've seen in that some just render especially poorly, definitely so by comparison to fonts I've used from typekit. So I think the issue is more related to the font format itself and this article seems to suggest the same point www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/04/24/a-closer-look-at-font-rendering/ For me it's just a matter of trying out each font at the actual size you plan to use it and making sure that it doesn't look too terrible. And then looking at it in Chrome to confirm that it won't look as bad to everyone.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Jennifer810

Your question implies that one or other platform renders fonts "worse" than the other, but in fact it's mostly just that Windows and Mac render fonts differently. I'm sure there's a perfectly good explanation for this, although I've never come across one, but it's an excellent example of why it is so important to verify page design on both platforms.

It's not a matter of Google fonts. Standard web fonts also render differently on a Mac than on Linux or Windows, which can cause mayhem with things like headings and horizontal nav bars if you don't take care.

I keep a Mac mostly for testing for cross-platform issues, and because I beta test on both platforms. Checking how a web page looks on a Mac (not relying, for example, solely on something Adobe's "Browser Lab") is always part of the design cycle.

Vote Up Vote Down