Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join

Login to follow query

More posts by @Dunderdale272

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Mendez628

I did a little research and it sounds like there is a lot to the <noscript> tag. Here is what I found:


Google does look at the data inside of the <noscript> tag
Spammers and black hats have abused the <noscript> tag before. So even when Google uses the <noscript> tag to determine search results it isn't one of the stronger rules.
Google seems to be currently index the text inside of the <noscript> tag for results but it appears to turn that on and off, see here, www.webmasterworld.com/google/3122771.htm Google will follow links inside of the <noscript> tag but it will not send PR to the pages linked from within the <noscript> tag


Also, according to this document, searchengineland.com/google-io-new-advances-in-the-searchability-of-javascript-and-flash-but-is-it-enough-19881, Google prefers the text within the noscript to match the test within your JavaScript. The goal of using <noscript> to provide graceful degradation. This article also makes it sound like Google can now index JavaScript fairly well which means abusing the <noscript> tag is a bad idea but that there is nothing wrong with using it.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme