: Should I bother to design web sites that can be viewed in 800x600 resolution? How many people still use the old 800x600 resolution? Designing a site that can fit on the screen for this resolution

@Smith883

What about doing a liquid layout instead of a fixed width layout? That way, you won't have to bother with browser resolutions and you still get the layout to look how you want it to be.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Carla537

Your site design should depend entirely on your target audience.

In most cases, most visitors to your website will have a resolution of greater than 800x600. You can check this using an analytics tool such as Google Analytics.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Dunderdale272

Design for higher browser resolutions but keep the most important area/content of your site within a smaller (for example: 760*y px) part that you can assign the highest priority regarding visibility. ("If my site loads in a 800* browser window, this is what the visitor sees first before scrolling anywhere. Secondary content lies outside this area.")

Btw, the answer also depends on the nature/content of your site and your expected audience. If you don't have access to exact stats, check out the most popular competitor sites in your chosen field and see what size they have optimized their design for.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Holmes151

Don't forget more and more people are using Smart Phones (and sometimes even not so smart phones) to view sites. Netbooks are also proliferating. Designing your site to look good for users with lower resolution is in some ways more important now than it has ever been.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Angela700

Make your site scale well. This tidbit of advice about 800x600 came from the days when designers would force sites to be 1024 when most people had 800, and couldn't view the site decently.

As mentioned before, the existing trend is to re-size your browser on your screen to fit against the other windows to optimize working.

My browser window is never the same size, i'm always moving it. Your wesbite should be able to deal with that, just like stackexchange does. Obviously don't worry about extreme cases where I make my window too thin.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Angie530

One resolution that may be pretty common, but is often forgotten, is 1024x600. It's used by many netbooks. Together with window title, menu and task bar, this leaves just about 500 px. So I wouldn't completely disregard the vertical space...

Vote Up Vote Down

@Nickens628

Unless you have a specific reason to, I'd say NO.

The majority of large sites are usually centered in a container 990px or a little smaller. This keeps it safe for anything 1024x768 or larger.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Kristi941

According to W3Counter 800 x 600 accounts for approximately 2.56% of users' browser resolution:

1 1024x768 23.72%
2 1280x800 18.42%
3 1280x1024 10.21%
4 1440x900 8.18%
5 1366x768 6.82%
6 1680x1050 5.19%
7 800x600 2.56%
8 1920x1080 2.37%
9 1152x864 2.11%
10 1024x1024 2.06%


Since that number is lower then IE6's market share, which many websites have abandoned support for, you can argue that it is safe to no longer support that resolution. Having said that, ideally your site design will be fluid and adjust for both narrow and wide screens. That way the maximum amount of visitors who visit your site get the best experience possible.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Debbie626

I would say NO*.

* - It all depends on who will be visiting your site. If a good percentage of your visitors use that resolution, then you may want to design for it. Otherwise, if the number is very small (or 0) ... then I wouldn't bother.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Kimberly868

Don't forget that while the monitor might be larger than 800x600 the browser window might not be full screen.

For example I'm running on LCD monitors with 1600x1200 resolution (still quite large) but my browser window is 1100x1200 (approximately).

So you need to look at the most common browser resolution, not the most common screen resolution.

Vote Up Vote Down