Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Odierno310

: If I reference a medical textbook or website for hand drawing bones is that considered copyright infringement? I can't quite figure this one out. I am not copying a custom piece of work, I

@Odierno310

Posted in: #Copyright #Drawing #Illustration

I can't quite figure this one out. I am not copying a custom piece of work, I am copying something that is available in nature, bones. I am also not tracing it, I am drawing by hand using them as a reference for accuracy. So, is that considered copyright infringement? Does it depend on how similar my drawings are to the ones I visually copied?

So if I look at a medical website or book and see a knee bone, then I draw one on paper or in a graphics editing tool by looking, with my eyes, at the referenced image, is that going to get me in trouble somehow?

I mean, surely I don't have to go find my own skeleton to draw from... right??

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Odierno310

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Connie430

Well, depending on the copyright license, medical drawings are treated equal to any other subject being drawn.

Here is a question about making drawings using photographs as a reference.

From a case ruling quoted on that site:


"To prove infringement, a plaintiff with a valid copyright must
demonstrate that: (1) the defendant has actually copied the
plaintiff's work; and (2) the copying is illegal because a substantial
similarity exists between the defendant's work and the protectible
elements of plaintiff's"


An interpretation of this could be: the pose, shading, angle, etc are "protectible elements", while human anatomy itself isn't. (But we're not lawyers!)

If your drawings aren't too blatantly copied you're probably safe under fair use.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Vandalay110

This is dodging the intent of the question a bit, but you could use the original Gray's Anatomy illustrations sources at Bartleby and Wikimedia. They're from the 1918 edition and are generally regarded as being in the public domain (IANAL).

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme