: Should tags with href="#" (or other internal links) use rel="noindex, nofollow"? For SEO purposes, should <a> tags with href="#" make use of rel="nofollow", rel="noindex", rel="noindex, nofollow",

@Voss4911412

People who are not sighted use tabs, not cursors and will be tabbing from one anchor tag to another when traversing the page.

Thus, if you are writing pages that are going to be read by folks who are using text-to-speech browsers (such as Jaws) using # tags internal to the page is a very helpful way to structure navigation.

Jaws will announce these tags as the person reaches them. So you can create a directory of important internal links using the # tags.

You should also use the H1, H2, etc. tags meaningfully because these are also used to create a non-visual index of the content for the person browsing the page.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Cofer257

You shouldn't have links with # or javascript:void(0) in the first place. You should point the link to an appropriate resource - for example if you are making an image viewer, the link should go to the image itself. If you are making a popup window, the link should point to the URL from the popup window, in case the user has Javascript disabled.

If there is no appropriate resource at all, then you shouldn't be using a link in the first place. Use a span or div element and attach the Javascript event to that. Note you can style it to look like a link with cursor: pointer;

And as Su recommends, never use nofollow on internal links. There used to be a process called "PageRank sculpting" (which was ridiculous and barely effective anyway) but that is no longer effective at all.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Twilah146

Personally I'd always prefer to not include any links that have an href="#", but I guess it depends on context.

If you're doing something clever with javascript with the link in question, which would be one of the only reasons I would expect to find an href="#" or href="javascript:void(0);", then why not, instead of allowing the link to ever appear in spiderable (not sure if that's actually a word) markup, why not simply append it into the page whenever your javascript executes, attaching event handlers and other functionality as needed.

Although using id/anchors as navigation within a page is perfectly valid, I can't quite see a reason to provide an empty one, although without an example this is all pretty subjective/conjecture.

APOLOGIES

I don't think I actually answered the question there....

I guess it may well be treated by google as a link back to the current page, but I'm not entirely sure how that would hinder, or help SEO at all.

Realistically, there's not a situation I can think of where it would be a good idea to provide a totally dead link though.

Answer. Doesn't matter, but still, don't do it anyway....!

Good luck!

Vote Up Vote Down

@Kristi941

Don't nofollow internal links.
Pointing to a flat # as destination arguably doesn't actually "link" anywhere, but there's still no reason to do it.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Murphy175

Unless you have Title Tags within the Link, the # sign won't do anything. It is not a link, because there is virtually no value. You could always use name="".

Vote Up Vote Down