: Competing against the same business name in search results A client of mine had an acrimonious split with their business partner. My client owns the legal business entities but unfortunately the

@Pierce454

As Su` suggested there is a legal process for this. They are ultimately domain name squatting and there are clear rules for domain name resolution stating how to go about it and that Trademarks for example are used to support the process - the aim of this is to force the other party to hand over the domain name which is in your company's name. The domain name was not registered in 'bad faith' but is clearly being used in bad faith to poach clients looking for the current company using previous links.

Su` mentioned intellectual property rights - Intellectual property defense. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act is also a legal process and very simple. Since the code on the website is protectred by copyright and is now being used by another organization rather than the legal entity which is using it, there is a Copyright breach.

DMCA can be used to force them to take the code down, which would mean that should they keep the website (or during the domain name dispute) they would be forced to remove the old code including logos designed by the legal company, and the visual appearance, making the side no longer appear as it previously did. DMCA is done very rapidly by all social media companies, so any alternative facebook page, twitter page, or post associating the company's legal name with the website would normally be removed on the same day.

Incoming links which direct the most traffic can be seen on websites like alexa.com but since there is every chance of getting the domain name back there may be no point contacting them.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Cugini213

Have you tried other social media outlets like Digg? If your client does not want to take legal action, then they will have to concede and change their domain and company name. That's the extreme left of taking legal action.

There is an option of reporting the other site to Google for trademark infringement, which I heard Google does act quickly one.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Mendez628

You mentioned your clients Facebook and Twitter accounts showing up in the SERPs, what about Linkedin and G+. Depending on your market a G+ page can help create personalized results if your clients customers connect in that way (meaning you don't have to outrank him in the general SERPs because your clients customers will see you on top due to social search). You could also use YouTube and image search to try and take over as many SERPs as possible.

Next I'd look at reclaiming some of the links from the old site. Presumably at least a decent percentage of people that linked to the old site did so because the recommended the business. Since your client is running the business now under a new domain it's perfectly reasonable to contact the people who linked to the old site and let them know your domain has changed. This gives you a double benefit because it increases your inbound links while at the same time decreases the links to the old site.

If all else fails you can try and get some press coverage on news sites that have strong domains. These articles are almost guaranteed to outrank the old site if done right, however, use this with caution and as a last resort because they will likely outrank your site as well.

Good luck.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Deb1703797

Well there is no much difference in .net ot .co.uk . for SEO domain age ( 3years ) is not important at all try to come with fresh and original content with optimization pages you can easily take over the existing website in search engine.

Google do follow strict guidelines and respect trademarks and genuineness of the business.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Kevin317

I know you said the client doesn't want to get lawyers involved, but um, your client needs to get a lawyer involved. An SEO slap fight just isn't going to fix this, and if it's the route they want to go then they don't get to complain about promotions sending business to the competitor since that's kind of the core of the entire problem. Everything from here down is not any form of legal advice but rather some possible things to consider when talking to a lawyer.


My client owns the legal business entities but unfortunately the other partner has the server/domain details.


I read the above as that your client has the rights to CompanyName. Presumably that also means any trademarks associated with CompanyName and so on. Is the domain companyname.com? If so, your client should be trying to seize it (talk to a lawyer) because this:


The other partner has since started a new company but has kept the old site up with the old company name and is taking business enquiries through that site but ultimately funnelling it through to their new company.


…possibly sets up a pretty good argument that the former partner is infringing on trademark and possibly even taking advantage of brand confusion if s/he is still operating in the same business space. (Talk to a lawyer.)

Even if the domain isn't exactly $companyname, the fact it's established in attachment to the previous incarnation of the business might still provide some leverage. I'm actually unclear how/why your client even agreed to leave these assets with the partner. Did they somehow not consider the web site or at least domain name a "business entity?"

Domain age is noted but not hugely important. Yes, multiple sites can show sitelinks for a given set of results, but you have little say over it happening. For example, if I search for "movie reviews" both Rotten Tomatoes and Roger Ebert have them, and they're not even the top two results; they sit at 1 and 3.


Can Google take any action on a domain that is trading in this way? If we submitted a claim could they drop the old site from the results?


Google cares about things like spam and duplicate/stolen content. This is an argument between former business owners who seem to have made some poor decisions in splitting up. I would say it's highly unlikely they're going to get involved.

Alternate option: As far as the whole thing with sending some business to the other person during promotions, is it completely out of the question for your client to just re-establish under a new name? It seems to me like this split is rather botched anyway and it might be easier for everyone involved.

Vote Up Vote Down