Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Samaraweera207

: Back-matter numbering It is a given fact that I cannot number the appendicies (i.e., back-matter) in my works/book by continuing the arabic numbering from the main-matter. The reason is that the

@Samaraweera207

Posted in: #Book #PageLayout #Typography

It is a given fact that I cannot number the appendicies (i.e., back-matter) in my works/book by continuing the arabic numbering from the main-matter. The reason is that the main-matter numbering is continued from a previous works and will continue in the next works, and the appendicies have to be omitted from this numbering. What is the prefered way to number the back-matter in this case? The front-matter is numbered by roman numerals.

I'm using LaTeX, I know that I can use basically whatever I want, however, I would prefer to follow the English typography traditions as much as possible.

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Samaraweera207

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@BetL875

In such cases I follow the recommendations of the Chicago Manual of Style, which suggests that back matter folios should be set using lowercase roman numerals following consecutively from the front matter in the same volume.

Yours is an unusual case, but the Chicago recommendation is the one I've seen used most often. Another convention for appendices is to use an uppercase A as a prefix: A-1, A-2, etc.

Always start the first appendix on a recto. When the consecutive numbering would give the recto an even numbering, the blank verso is considered to be the even-numbered page.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Rambettina927

Lowercase roman numerals:
i.1, i.2, i.3, ii.1, ...

Alphabetical:
a.1, a.2, a.3, b.1, ...

As long as the reader can navigate, any scheme is acceptable. Unless you're publishing in an industry that has a particular set of expectations.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme