: Rel=canonical from product to category A website selling a medical book called "anatomy cihak" has 4 html pages - a category called "anatomy cihak" and three product categories for each book
A website selling a medical book called "anatomy cihak" has 4 html pages - a category called "anatomy cihak" and three product categories for each book in the series - "anatomy cihak 1", "2" and "3".
Should I do a rel=canonical from the individual product pages to the category that lists all three books?
The search term used by customers is "anatomy cihak" and I believe the product category is the relevant page that Google should show in search results.
An interesting note - when I search for "anatomy cihak 1" the first search result from my site is actually "anatomy cihak 2" even though it is less relevant (a different edition of the book). This is the reason why I am thinking of doing a rel=canonical - the results are not relevant.
More posts by @Candy875
2 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
With addition to PatomaS response.
Not only would using rel=canonical be incorrect but you could also cause serious SEO issues and maybe un-indexing of some webpages via google.
For example, you have a webpage a.com/abc and you have a webpage called a.com/adc
you put rel=canonical on a.com/abc pointing to a.com/adc and a.com/adc points to itself you are in effect telling search engines that a.com/abc is a duplicate copy of a.com/adc thus instead of getting penalised for duplicate content the search engine does not index the duplicate page. For a more in depth decription see here
In answering your question. You main page should be "anatomy cihak" however this would be the section and the other 3 are products (1,2,3) if you set your website out and lay this out correctly in a structured format google will pick this up. However, would it really be a bad thing for google to show the product when someone is looking for "anatomy cihak" surely this would create quicker sales as the customer is getting exactly what they are looking for? Use structured data and keep the title tags unique and let google decide which is more "relevant"
The reason to use the rel=canonical shouldn't be the term users use to get to the site, but the content.
If each page has different content and/or different reason to exist, like index and content, then there is no need for canonical, even more, it's use would be incorrect, semantically speaking.
What you should do, for instance, is improve the product page and have a related section where you point to the other books. And of course to the main category. Also try to improve the category index page so it becomes relevant.
Update considering your comments
If a page is ranked higher that others, that means that itÅ› content is more relevant to users than the other ones, although, the fact that is higher in ranking also generates a vicious cycle that is difficult to break. A popular page is going to attract more visitor, making it more popular and so on.
In any case, improve the content of each page as much as you can so each page can hold it's own ground on searches and ranking, don't try to change that artificially. If each page provides an accurate description of it's content, users will be able to determine which page they want to visit, and which book to buy.
Don't worry about the order they rank, in any case, worry about them ranking or not. And remember, the most important aspect is that users can find the right information.
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2024 All Rights reserved.