: Should I scale an image first, or index it? I have an image, it's the Backtrack_5_PitchBlack.jpg found at http://www.backtrack-linux.org/screenshots/, and I'd like to get it down to 640*480 for

@Bethany839

First crop and scale (or scale and crop)
then index to 14 colors.


For an extreme example, say we want to end up with a 2-color (blank and white) image that is 1/10 the size of some original image.
If we were to index first, generating a big black and white image,
then when we downscale 10:1,
we end up with a grayscale image -- 10x10 regions with few black pixels would downscale to one light grey pixel; 10x10 regions with few white pixels would downscale to one dark grey pixel, etc.
At best, we would end up with the same greyscale image that results from scaling the original image directly.
At worst, if we index first, and then scale, smooth gradients might be smashed into white on one side, black on the other side, with a distracting and meaningless edge somewhere in the middle.

Either way, it would be better to scale first, and then index.

p.s.
If you only have 14 colors available,
sometimes the final image looks better if you manipulate the image a little to manually "flatten" gradients to 3, 2, or even 1 solid color, letting the indexer use fewer index slots on gradients, and more index slots on anti-aliased pixels.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Rambettina927

You'll want to scale first. Downsizing the image will compress your palette to some extent in and of itself. Indexing before hand would throw color away that may be helpful in the down-sampling step.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Mendez620

I would scale then Index - I can't think of a technical reason why, but.. If in doubt try it both ways, it won't take long and you can compare them both afterwards to see which best fits the purpose.

[added]:

Scale, then index:



Index, then scale:

Vote Up Vote Down