Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Smith574

: How to reduce the file size of a Live Trace (high fidelity) image I have a PNG, its width is 1960px and height is 1583px. It is 3.3MB in total. When I go to Illustrator Live Trace >

@Smith574

Posted in: #AdobeIllustrator #ImageTrace

I have a PNG, its width is 1960px and height is 1583px. It is 3.3MB in total.

When I go to Illustrator Live Trace > Photo High Fidelity, and then I expand the paths, the vector image is very good but the file size is now 8.9MB.

I thought that when I convert to vectors it would have a smaller file size, but it increases.

If I create a vector file from a photo will it always have a larger file size or is there a better way to convert and save them?

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Smith574

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Cooney243

First, it may sound obvious, but check your links panel and make sure you don't have that pesky png laying around the pasteboard somewhere. I've noticed that a lot of designers instinctively dupe the image prior to expanding paths "just in case".

In terms of the final vector art itself, you basically have two options.


Cut down the number of vectors via Object > Path > Simplify
Simplify the tracing in the first place via the Tracing Options

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Samaraweera207

When Illustrator traces an image it searches for details and creates paths, and it does it pretty well, it never has the sharp detail of the original photo but I like the artistic look it applies.

Vector files store all their information as mathematical values, allowing them to scale to any size, this means a small vector image's file size probably won't differ very much from a much larger version of the same vector image. This also means they can't be compressed.

Pixel based images can be shrunk and optimised with various techniques that essentially trick the human eye to see it satisfactorily, whilst progressively degrading its quality the more you modify the same file (not from master file).

Now, simply knowing that, you can logically deduce that if an image has a lot of detail, there will be a lot of paths, a lot of mathematical data and a large file size, conversely, if the image has few details, it won't require that many paths and won't be so big.

So to conclude, it depends on the image your tracing, and the file it's coming from. You may end up with a similar file size, but I doubt you'll end up with a smaller file size unless they're very basic shapes like a simple square.

Additionally, it's kind of redundant to compare the file size of different formats that serve very different purposes and have very different qualities.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme