Mobile app version of vmapp.org
Login or Join
Cugini998

: What is considered a "Logo" for stock photo use? I am creating a "logo" for a group of women who fly fish in Central Oregon. They are a small group that gets together within the larger club

@Cugini998

Posted in: #Copyright #Legal #Logo #StockImages

I am creating a "logo" for a group of women who fly fish in Central Oregon. They are a small group that gets together within the larger club called Central Oregon Fly Fishers. In the past, they've used unattractive clip art for their group and I wanted to revamp the icon for them.

Essentially, I have chosen a stock mountain image, a stock fly rod image and a font that will be incorporated to create this icon. This icon will be used for hats, sweatshirts, gear, Facebook, website and handouts. There are so many uses that are approved (including some of the above) that I'm unsure when it is called a "logo"?

I don't want to get any surprise fines... but I also want to help them out without designing from scratch.

10.02% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Login to follow query

More posts by @Cugini998

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

 

@Megan533

There's a licensing agreement for stock art & it says what it can be used for. Usually, you buy the kind of licensing that allows you to sell it in a logo design & then you're covered. As for the font, you usually tell the client to purchase a license.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


 

@Murray976

If art contains any stock graphics - i.e. images which have either been purchased or downloaded from other sources... technically it will never be a logo in strictest terms, because you don't own the rights to the image(s). If you don't own the rights, you can't technically claim the rights and therefore call it a "logo" in the strictest sense. "Logos" customarily contain 100% original artwork, not composites of artwork owned by others. Of course, you can purchase unlimited rights to stock art, in which case, you would own the rights and therefore could legally claim the artwork as a "logo" or trademark.

You should also be aware that most (if not all) royalty free stock services expressly state that no image may used as a logo or trademark in part or whole. You may want to read the license agreement for wherever you got the stock images.

Wikipedia defines a logo as....


a graphic mark, emblem, or symbol commonly used by commercial enterprises, organizations and even individuals to aid and promote instant public recognition. Logos are either purely graphic (symbols/icons) or are composed of the name of the organization (a logotype or wordmark).


Your described usage would certainly fall under the technical umbrella of a Logo to me... the fact that you do not own the rights means you may be in violation of any stock image service agreements and may be liable for misrepresenting artwork as original when it is not. The safest bet is always "start from scratch" if the intent is an actual Logo.

Now, that being posted... you can call anything a "logo" in general terms. It's only when you try and copyright, trademark, or prevent anyone else from using the artwork that my initial paragraph here matters. Or when someone else realizes you've used their artwork in an unlicensed manner.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down


Back to top | Use Dark Theme