: Using two salts for user authentication? When storing user credentials in a database, we all know that hashing the password is the bare minimum you should do, but salting it before hashing is

@Dunderdale272

I just read this question and it reminded me of a question I posted on SO about a year ago: Comprehensive information about hash salts. You might be interested in reading over the question and answers as it has some other information which could be very useful to anyone interested in learning a bit more about hashes.

I should also note that implementing user authentication in general is not something which you really want to tackle on your own if you can avoid it. Always remember Don't Reinvent The Wheel, Unless You Plan on Learning More About Wheels.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Sarah324

This pretty much has already been asked on StackOverflow: Double salt for hashing passwords?

Vote Up Vote Down

@XinRu657

I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.
This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The accepted answer on this question is a good starting point, follow the links.

My take is that:

The static salt (which you call global) is somewhat valuable because:


It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.
This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.


The per-password salt is important because:


It is a random string, unique for each password, generated on the server side, and stored in plain text in the database. For N passwords, this effectively makes the total search space for a rainbow table attach N x N. This cannot be effectively attacked by pre-computed rainbow tables today due to the sheer size of the dataset.


Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the username if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.

EDIT: Please do read the excellent article "Enough With The Rainbow Tables: What You Need To Know About Secure Password Schemes". Most of what is said about password hashing is wrong, including the whole 'MD5/SHA256 with a salt' approach so often used.

Vote Up Vote Down