: Having google index canonicals but users using parameters - correct? I'm working on a site that has a search facility with multiple parameters that look up property listings. The possible parameters
I'm working on a site that has a search facility with multiple parameters that look up property listings. The possible parameters are:
City, Area, Building Type, Min. Bedrooms, Max Rental Price, Page Number, Sort Order.
The 'raw' url, without any rewriting would look something like this:
mysite.com/city=1&area=1&type=1&bedrooms=3&price=1000&page=3&sort=1
While you're using my site, it doesn't matter to me or to you what the URL looks like, so I think I'm happy to work with the so called 'dirty' URL.
It matters however, what Googlebot sees, so i'm planning to add a URL rewrite to allow access to pages like:
mysite.com/london/kensington/apartments
And then i'm planning to add canonicals to make sure that's the page that gets indexed - no matter what your bedroom / price preferences are, what page of results you're on or the order in which you want them to appear. The idea is that Google will only index fewer, higher quality 'view-all' pages, but users will be able to drill down and refine their results to get very specific.
The question however is whether or not this is a correct use of the canonical and whether it will lead to the desired effect?
EDIT
It doesn't matter if google indexes 'dirty' URLs with parameters (though it should index the clean one when theres one available). What really matters is that the site gets found when people conduct a relevant search. Having it above competitor sites is the idea, if they didn't have an SEO strategy.
More posts by @Murphy175
2 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
You could use a canonical reference on the page mysite.com/city=1&area=1&type=1&bedrooms=3&price=1000&page=3&sort=1 to point to mysite.com/london/kensington/apartments as the master page. However, there are a couple reasons why I wouldn't.
The content on mysite.com/city=1&area=1&type=1&bedrooms=3&price=1000&page=3&sort=1 is not usually an exact or even close match for the content on mysite.com/london/kensington/apartments. Correctly mapping all of your search result pages to pages like this, mysite.com/london/kensington/apartments could become tricky or complex as your site grows.
There isn't necessarily any value in doing it. How will Google be able to find the page mysite.com/city=1&area=1&type=1&bedrooms=3&price=1000&page=3&sort=1? From what I understand, this page is only accessible as a result from an inside search and Google will not enter data combinations into your search forms to find out the links to these pages. Therefore, the only way pages like the this one will end up in Google crawl is if you put a direct link to them in your sitemap.xml file or on an href on a static link on your site, which I assume you won't be doing as there could be literally millions of combinations. That means the only links to a specific search result would have to come from an external site. In which case I would suggest adding this tag to all of your internal search result pages, <meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />. This tag tells Google not to index the page but to follow all of the links on the page.
Canonical URLs are to be used when two different URLs can be used to pull up the same content. If your URL rewriting causes this to happen then canonical URLs will be necessary.
So if:
mysite.com/london/kensington/apartments
pulls up the same content as
mysite.com/city=london&area=kensington&typeapartments
then you need canonical URLs
(That second example may not make sense but hopefully you get the idea).
UPDATE
If the only difference between two pages is the sort order of a metric or something similar you will need to use canonical URLs for those pages.
Terms of Use Create Support ticket Your support tickets Stock Market News! © vmapp.org2024 All Rights reserved.