: Which software should I use for poster designing Current I have to use two softwares for poster designing. The text I have to write in corel draw and then I export it in eps and then use

@Si6392903

It would be interesting what especific effect you do need, becouse a looooot of efects can be done in vectors inside Corel, knowing how to use the tools.

Here are some examples of what you mention bevel and shadow.

A-D are done with just some clicks.

A) Effects > Bisel + Shadow

B) Extrude + Shadow (extrude to 0)

C) Extrude + Shadow

D) Plus perspective and some adjusts on the gradients

E) Is to give an example of the versatility in doing all inside Corel. I'm sure I can push the design way further.
otake.com.mx/Foros/CorelTextEfects-01.jpg http://otake.com.mx/Foros/CorelTextEfects-02.jpg

I am used to do a loooot of retouching on cases you think you need photoshop actually inside Corel, like this exercise: Creating an implied floor with light
otake.com.mx/Foros/ImpliedFloor.jpg
Becouse you need to know the tools.

But there is nothing wrong in combining several aplications. Actually you in most cases need to do that.

Vote Up Vote Down

@BetL875

You can use Photoshop for the entire process (it's been a standard for movie posters for almost 20 years) except actual vector drawing (although even there, it's getting more versatile). Dan Sorenson's excellent "Photoshop CS2 for Advertising and Marketing" has examples ranging from comic book art to highway billboards.

The big trick with text in Photoshop is to save as PDF for output to print, which preserves the vector information in the text. A native PSD is read by most applications as a raster image (using the flattened raster image that is saved in the PSD). PDF avoids that problem.

To reinforce what DA01 said: almost any designer works with multiple tools. The Adobe Creative Suite is called a "Suite" because the tools work particularly well together. You can't do top quality work with only one program. Screwdrivers makes poor chisels, and vice versa.

InDesign is the hub of all my print work, because it has excellent vector and raster effects capabilities built in and it's WAY faster than Photoshop for accurate layout. Photoshop is my support tool for fancy raster effects and occasional type effects that InDesign can't yet do, Illustrator for vector art that's beyond InDesign's capabilities.

As an example, here's the Photoshop part of a full-page ad (although it could easily have been a poster). The headline text effect was easily done in Photoshop, and in the rush (I had about an hour to create this) I didn't think to just do it in InDesign. The supplied artist photograph cuts off just to the left of the performer, so the "beams of light" were added in Photoshop along with the extended background.



I did everything else in InDesign:

Vote Up Vote Down

@Lee3735518

Industry Standard is Photoshop and Illustrator. Both are often used interchangeably. All the bitmap artwork is put together in photoshop and all the type and vector elements, and maybe even the arrangement of all the elements, is done in illustrator. But ultimately it is up to you to develop your own workflow.

Vote Up Vote Down

@Shelley591

Corel and PhotoShop should work fine. Depending on the poster you'd likely be using a mix of vector illustration (Adobe Illustrator, InkScape, Corel Draw, etc.) and Raster image editing (PhotoShop, GIMP, etc.) and maybe some page layout software as well (QuarkXpress, InDesign, Scribus).

That said, you normally wouldn't want a raster image editor to be your final file format as you found out, you'll have trouble making crisp type unless you are using a really high end image for it all. For text effects you can only make in PhotoShop, I'd consider doing that in PhotoShop, but then import that back into Corel as an image so you can finish up the rest of the text.

Vote Up Vote Down